---

Welcome to ICEEICT 2024 Paper Submission Guideline.
Before you proceed for submission, you are requested to go through the paper submission requirments and paper assessment criteria in the following sections.

• If you do not have a CMT login ID, Register below:
  
  Register
  
  
• Submit your paper at the Microsoft CMT site of ICEEICT 2024.
  
  Microsoft CMT


• You should click on the “Create New Submission”. Please fill up all the necessary information including Title, Abstract, Co-authors, Subject Areas and the full paper in their respective field.
• To add coauthors, please use “Enter email to add new author” field. We would recommend all co-authors open their respective CMT Accounts before submission.
• You may also try Microsoft CMT app at Google Playstore and Appstore to keep track of your submitted papers on the move, and receive notification from chairs about their paper's status by following the below links:
  
  Google Playstore App Store

---

Submitted papers should SATISFY the criteria listed below.

Paper Typesetting and Structure

• Paper template: The paper submission template (IEEE double-column) can be found in the following link :
  Template
  
• File Format: PDF (FileName.pdf)
• File size: 3 MB
• Paper Size: A4
• Paper length: Maximum 6 pages including all figures, tables, and references
• Fonts: Type 3 fonts are not allowed. All fonts are to be embedded in the PDF file.

• IEEE Publication Policy

Accepted papers will be submitted for inclusion into IEEE Xplore subject to meeting IEEE Xplore’s scope and quality requirements.
All the authors confirm through the corresponding/submitting author that they:
• Contributed to the development of the paper as per the IEEE publication policy including the authorship criteria
• Strictly followed the IEEE type-setting and bibliographic requirements
• Agreed to the current sequence of the authors
• Approved the paper for submission to ICEEICT 2024



• Contribution and Multiple Submission

  • The paper contains the original contribution of the authors and it is neither published previously nor has been submitted for any publication.
  • The authors also agree that they will not submit this paper simultaneously anywhere during this conference without prior approval of the ICEEICT 2024 TPC chair.
  • As per IEEE policy, similarity index must be less than 30%.
  • For plagiarism and multiple submissions, please check details in the following links:
    IEEE policies for plagiarism (https://www.ieee.org/publications/rights/plagiarism/plagiarism.html)
    IEEE policies for multiple submissions (https://www.ieee.org/publications/rights/multi-sub-guidelines-intro.html)

• Use of a Large Language Model (LLM) in the manuscript

  The authors must declare that the use of ChatGPT or any LLM in the preparation of this research paper is either not applicable, or if utilized, has been duly acknowledged within the paper (preferably in the 'ACKNOWLEDGEMENT' Section). It is explicitly stated that such models were employed solely for non-intellectual purposes. The authors confirm that the output generated by ChatGPT or any LLM has been carefully reviewed and approved by them. The responsibility for the content and accuracy of the information rests solely with the authors.

• Double-blind Review Requirements

  In support of the double-blind review policy of ICEEICT, the authors confirm that the submitted paper is anonymized by excluding the authors' names, affiliations, postal and email addresses, direct form (e.g., with the words 'our previous/earlier work') of self-citation, and any other pertinent information that directly or indirectly disclose the complete or partial identity of any of the authors.

• No-Show Policy

  • Please take note that IEEE has a strict policy on no-show.
  • For any accepted paper, one of the authors or his/her representative having similar technical skills must present the paper at the conference.
  • Papers with no-show participants will not be submitted to IEEE Xplore.
  • No refund of the paid fees may be claimed by the no-show author.



• Microsoft CMT Account

  All the co-authors of a submission must have their CMT accounts with their given email addresses.

---

The ICEEICT TPC sets the following publication criteria to be considered in assessing the initially submitted papers. The ICEEICT TPC would prescreen each paper to categorize the papers into two groups: ‘Desk Accept’ and ‘Desk Reject’. The ‘Desk-Accept’ category papers are then sent for double-blind review, where three reviewers of respective tracks will review each paper. Each criterion can have any one of the five levels: Very Poor (-1), Poor (0), Average (1), Good (2), and Excellent (3). Accumulating these criteria-based scores, a total review score is determined for a paper to be shortlisted for the final acceptance and rejection.

• Justification/Rationale

  1. How well is the work motivated and grounded in theory and prior literature?
  2. How close does the paper fall within the scope of ICEEICT?



• Importance of the contribution

  1. How important question does the manuscript address?
  2. How innovative is the presented work in nature, approach, or scope?
  3. How much potential does the manuscript have to advance the discipline?



• Clarity and Format

  1. How clearly is the paper written?
  2. How is the paper’s organizational coherence (e.g., is the heading structure clear and helpful to the reader? does the flow of the sections work well to convey the key points?)
  3. How appropriate/complete is the list of references?
  4. How is the IEEE style followed in organizing and type-setting the content (i.e., texts, figures, tables, citations, and references) of the paper?



• Methods/Approach

  1. How clear, well-reasoned, appropriate, and current are the overall strategy, methodology, research design, and techniques?
  2. How adequate is the given information for reproducibility?
  3. How was the methodology implemented with rigor and applicable reporting standards?
  4. How appropriate were the data analyses for the purpose of the study and research questions?



• Results/Findings

  1. How appropriately were the data collected, analyzed, and reported with clarity?
  2. How well-reasoned and succinct are the presented results and findings?
  3. How clear and effective are the presented tables and figures in the body of the manuscript?
  4. How appropriate is the use of any supplemental material incorporated?



• Discussion/Conclusions

  1. How well are the results/findings synthesized and interpreted within the context of previous literature, existing models, or theories?
  2. How are the significant study limitations disclosed for future research?